D1.154 - Safety of ultra-rush immunotherapy starting protocol with the molecular extract Diater Alt a 1 mol mix

Poster abstract

Background

Molecular and precision medicine are transforming allergy management, offering highly targeted therapies. Immunotherapy using molecular extracts is now available, with proven safety in conventional protocols (manufacturer-recommended Figure1). However, its safety under ultra-rush initiation remains uncertain. 

Method

Our objective was to evaluate the safety of the molecular extract Diater Alt a 1 Mol Mix under an ultra-rush initiation protocol in patients from Seville, Spain, with rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without asthma, allergic to Alternaria, pollens (grass and olive), and/or mites.

We conducted a prospective observational study with patients starting immunotherapy between October 2023 and May 2024. The ultra-rush protocol consisted of 0.2 mL SC in one arm and 0.3 mL SC in the other, separated by a 30-minute observation period (Figure1). The maintenance dose (0.5 mL, divide in two arms) was administered after one month. Demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were collected, and adverse events were self-reported.

Results

A total of 45 patients (55% male) initiated immunotherapy, aged 6 to 52 years (mean age: 18 years). All had rhinoconjunctivitis; five had asthma confirmed by spirometry, and 27 reported asthma-like symptoms but with normal or unperformed spirometry.

All patients were sensitized to Alternaria alternata, pollens, and/or mites, with varying patterns (Figure 2). Serum total IgE ranged from 21.2 to 1550 IU/mL (mean: 359.22 IU/mL), specific IgE range is shown in Table 1. Ten patients had specific IgE levels >100 IU/mL: two for Ole e 1, three for Ole e 7, one for Ole e 1 and Ole e 9, and four for Alt a 1.

Of the prescribed immunotherapy, 68.9% was for two allergens (Alt a 1 + grass/olive pollen or mites), and 31.1% for three allergens (Alt a 1 + grass and olive pollen). No adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

Using an ultra-rush initiation protocol, this observational study, demonstrated a favorable safety profile and time-saver strategy, with no adverse events. Despite the small sample size, the findings are clinically significant and representative of our population.